Poh v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 14-649V
    Filed: May 27, 2015
    Unpublished
    ****************************
    JOHN POH,                              *
    *
    Petitioner,         *     Joint Stipulation on Damages;
    *     Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine;
    *     Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                    *     Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                    *
    *
    Respondent.         *
    *
    ****************************
    Amber Wilson, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
    Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
    Vowell, Chief Special Master:
    On July 23, 2014, John Poh filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine
    Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome [“GBS”]
    as the result of an Influenza [“Flu”] vaccination. Petition, ¶¶ 2-12; Stipulation, filed May
    21, 2015, ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of his
    injury for more than six months, has filed no other action for this injury, and has received
    no prior award or settlement. Petition, ¶¶ 13, 15-16; Stipulation, ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent
    denies that petitioner’s GBS was caused-in-fact by his influenza vaccination, and denies
    that the vaccine caused any other injury or his current condition.” Stipulation, ¶ 6.
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
    to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government
    Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501
    note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2006).
    Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. Stipulation, ¶ 7. On
    May 21, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and
    describing the settlement terms.
    Respondent agrees to pay petitioner a lump sum of $170, 000.00 in the form of a
    check payable to petitioner. Stipulation, ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 
    Id. I adopt
    the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the
    amount and on the terms set forth therein. In the absence of a motion for review filed
    pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in
    accordance with this decision.3
    s/Denise K. Vowell
    Denise K. Vowell
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each filing a notice renouncing
    the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-649

Judges: Denise Kathryn Vowell

Filed Date: 6/17/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021