United States v. Stephen Dorsey , 605 F. App'x 595 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 15-1166
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Stephen Roshon Dorsey
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ___________________________
    No. 15-1167
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Kenneth Williams
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeals from United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
    ____________
    Submitted: July 1, 2015
    Filed: July 7, 2015
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    These are consolidated direct criminal appeals from judgments entered by the
    district court.1 Stephen Dorsey and Kenneth Williams each pled guilty to distributing
    cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a school, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1),
    (b)(1)(C), and 860(a), and each was sentenced by the district court at the bottom of
    his calculated Guidelines range. Their attorneys have moved for leave to withdraw,
    and have filed briefs under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), challenging
    the substantive reasonableness of the respective sentences. Having jurisdiction under
    
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , this court affirms.
    This court concludes that the district court did not impose a substantively
    unreasonable sentence in either case. See United States v. David, 
    682 F.3d 1074
    ,
    1076-77 (8th Cir. 2012) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions); see
    also United States v. Cook, 
    698 F.3d 667
    , 670 (8th Cir. 2012) (on appeal, applying
    presumption of reasonableness to within-Guidelines-range sentence).            An
    independent review of both records reveals no nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v.
    Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988)
    The judgments in both cases are affirmed. Counsels’ motions to withdraw are
    granted.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the Northern District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-1166

Citation Numbers: 605 F. App'x 595

Filed Date: 7/7/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023