Woodrow Jones, Sr. v. Texas Juvenile Justice Dept , 698 F. App'x 215 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 17-40488       Document: 00514181831        Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/03/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 17-40488
    Fif h Circuit
    FILED
    Summary Calendar                          October 3, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    WOODROW J. JONES, SR.,                                                            Clerk
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, Interim Executive Director
    (David Reilly),
    Defendant - Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 9:14-CV-60
    Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Woodrow J. Jones, Sr. sued his employer, the Texas Juvenile Justice
    Department (“Department”), and its interim executive director for employment
    discrimination and retaliation seeking recovery pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981
    and 1983. The district court held that Jones’s claims were barred under the
    statute of limitations.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40488    Document: 00514181831      Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/03/2017
    No. 17-40488
    In a Section 1983 action, federal courts apply the general personal injury
    statute of limitations from the forum state. Price v. City of San Antonio, 
    431 F.3d 890
    , 892 (5th Cir. 2005). In Texas, which is where the events leading to
    this case occurred, the general personal injury statute of limitations is two
    years. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 16.003 (West 2017). The cause of
    action for a Section 1983 claim begins to accrue “when the plaintiff ‘knows or
    has reason to know of the injury which is the basis of the action.’” 
    Price, 431 F.3d at 893
    (quoting Jackson v. Johnson, 
    950 F.2d 263
    , 265 (5th Cir. 1992)). A
    claim under Section 1983 is the exclusive remedy for a Section 1981 violation
    by a state actor. Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 
    491 U.S. 701
    , 735 (1989).
    Jones’s alleged injury accrued when the Department terminated him on
    December 22, 2011. Jones did not file this lawsuit until May 2, 2014, more
    than two years after the injury. The statute of limitations had expired, and
    his Section 1983 claim is barred. The Section 1981 claim also fails because, as
    a claim against a state actor, it is governed by Section 1983 and by the same
    two-year limitation period.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-40488

Citation Numbers: 698 F. App'x 215

Filed Date: 10/3/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023