Gould v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2015 )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-613V
Filed: June 12, 2015
Unpublished
****************************
WILLIAM GOULD, *
*
Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages;
* Influenza Vaccine or Flu Vaccine;
* Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”);
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
****************************
Lawrence R. Cohan, Esq., Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Linda Sarah Renzi, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Vowell, Chief Special Master:
On July 15, 2014, William Gould filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the
“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome
(GBS) resulting from the influenza vaccine he received on January 4, 2013. Petition at
1; Stipulation, filed June 12, 2015, ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that he
experienced the residual effects of GBS for more than six months. Petition, ¶ 24;
Stipulation, ¶ 4. Respondent denies that the influenza vaccination caused petitioner’s
GBS or any other injury. Stipulation, ¶ 6.
Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. Stipulation, ¶ 7. On
June 12, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and
describing the settlement terms.
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
Respondent agrees to pay petitioner a lump sum of $190,000.00 in the form of a
check payable to petitioner, William Gould. Stipulation, ¶ 8. This amount represents
compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
Id.
I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the
amount and on the terms set forth therein. In the absence of a motion for review filed
pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in
accordance with this decision.3
s/Denise K. Vowell
Denise K. Vowell
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each filing a notice renouncing
the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
2
Case 1:14-vv-00613-UNJ Document 20 Filed 06/12/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00613-UNJ Document 20 Filed 06/12/15 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00613-UNJ Document 20 Filed 06/12/15 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00613-UNJ Document 20 Filed 06/12/15 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00613-UNJ Document 20 Filed 06/12/15 Page 5 of 5