Joan Williams v. United States , 699 F. App'x 386 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 16-10759      Document: 00514210054         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/25/2017
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 16-10759                                  FILED
    Summary Calendar                         October 25, 2017
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    JOAN MARIE WILLIAMS,
    Petitioner-Appellant
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent-Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:15-CV-2775
    Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Joan Marie Williams, former federal prisoner # 24135-077, was convicted
    of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments and to structure financial
    transactions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 in 1993. The district court denied
    Williams’s third petition for a writ of coram nobis challenging her conviction.
    The writ of coram nobis is an extraordinary remedy available when a prisoner
    has completed her sentence and is no longer in custody for purposes of seeking
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-10759    Document: 00514210054     Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/25/2017
    No. 16-10759
    relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Dyer, 
    136 F.3d 417
    , 422 (5th Cir. 1998); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). We review the
    district court’s “factual findings for clear error, questions of law de novo, and
    the district court’s ultimate decision to deny the writ for abuse of discretion.”
    Santos-Sanchez v. United States, 
    548 F.3d 327
    , 330 (5th Cir. 2008), vacated on
    other grounds, 
    559 U.S. 1046
    , (2010). Williams has not shown that the district
    court abused its discretion in denying her petition for a writ of coram nobis.
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-10759

Citation Numbers: 699 F. App'x 386

Filed Date: 10/25/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023