United States v. Yorlli Felix-Jaquez , 611 F. App'x 211 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 14-40421      Document: 00513138816         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/03/2015
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 14-40421                                    FILED
    Summary Calendar                             August 3, 2015
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    YORLLI GONZALO FELIX-JAQUEZ,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:13-CR-1265
    Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Yorlli Gonzalo Felix-Jaquez appeals the 46-month within-guidelines
    sentence imposed in connection with his conviction for illegal reentry after
    deportation.     Felix-Jaquez argues that the district court plainly erred in
    imposing the 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) based on
    his prior Delaware felony conviction for drug dealing. He contends that the
    statute criminalizing the offense does not require proof of remuneration and
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40421     Document: 00513138816    Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/03/2015
    No. 14-40421
    that, therefore, the conviction does not constitute a drug trafficking offense
    within the meaning of § 2L1.2.
    Felix-Jaquez’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo,
    
    782 F.3d 198
    , 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015) petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015)
    (No. 14-10355).      In 
    Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05
    , we held that an
    enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug
    trafficking offense is warranted regardless of whether the conviction for the
    prior offense required proof of remuneration.
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-40421

Citation Numbers: 611 F. App'x 211

Filed Date: 8/3/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023