Coughlin v. Nevada Supreme Court Clerk's Office ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                In Docket No. 61462, Coughlin has filed a "Petition for
    Dissolution of Temporary Suspension Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule
    102(4); and/or alternatively, SCR 111(7) Petition to Show Good Cause for
    the Court to Set Aside its Order Temporarily Suspending Attorney From
    the Practice of Law," which appears to challenge the merits of the petit
    larceny conviction underlying the suspension, as well as the suspension
    itself. In ,Docket No. 62104, Coughlin filed a petition apparently asking
    this court to stay the proceedings scheduled for later that day before the
    disciplinary board, which was going to consider the referral from this court
    entered in Docket No. 60838, as well as other pending grievances against
    Coughlin. Coughlin has since filed a motion requesting an extension of
    time to pay the filing fee or to request to proceed in forma pauperis, as
    well as thousands of pages of other documents appearing to address the
    temporary suspension and various bar disciplinary and legal matters with
    which he is involved. In Docket No. 63822, Coughlin has filed a "Motion to
    Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Declaration in Support Thereof to File
    Petition for Writ Allowing Coughlin to File in 60838," which appears to
    address various bar disciplinary matters involving Coughlin; Coughlin has
    also filed over 1,240 pages of exhibits in that case. Finally, in Docket No.
    65587, Coughlin has filed a "Petition for Reinstatement Pursuant to SCR
    111(10)," in which he asserts that his petit larceny conviction has been
    remanded . . . for a new trial" and makes other arguments in support of
    lifting his temporary suspension; Coughlin has also filed two supplements
    to this petition. 1
    second supplement was styled as a request for permission to
    1 The
    file such a document. Because the request and the proposed second
    supplement were combined in a single document, it has already been filed.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A
    We have disregarded factual assertions in Coughlin's
    documents that are not supported by references to the pertinent record or
    that are outside the record, Carson Ready Mix, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank, 
    97 Nev. 474
    , 476, 
    635 P.2d 276
    . 277 (1981). In addition, to the extent the
    documents attempt to relitigate the petit larceny conviction underlying
    Coughlin's suspension, as well as other legal matters in which he is
    involved, we note that the instant matters are not the proper forums for
    doing so. Additionally, Coughlin has failed to satisfactorily demonstrate
    that his conviction has been reversed or to otherwise show good cause for
    this court to set aside its order of temporary suspension or to direct the
    clerk to allow him to file documents to the same effect in an already-closed
    case. Finally, with respect to his request to stay the bar proceeding that
    has already occurred, that request is moot. Accordingly, all requests in
    these matters are denied.
    It is so ORDERED. 2
    /••••••■Li"           , C.J.
    Hardesty
    g't                   ,
    Parraguirre
    Saitta
    Gibbons
    2 This   order constitutes our final disposition of these matters.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A
    cc: Zachary Barker Coughlin
    David A. Clark, Bar Counsel
    Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada
    J. Thomas Susich, Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    4
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 63822

Filed Date: 6/18/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021