James Rankins, III v. John McGowan Working Prt, In ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 17-11372       Document: 00514569464         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/24/2018
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    No. 17-11372                             FILED
    Summary Calendar                       July 24, 2018
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    JAMES L. RANKINS III,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    JOHN MCGOWAN WORKING PARTNERS, INCORPORATED
    Defendant – Appellee
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    No. 4:17-CV-881
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    Plaintiff James L. Rankins, III brought this pro se action against
    Defendant John McGowan Working Partners, Inc. in the Northern District of
    Texas, alleging that McGowan Working Partners committed unauthorized
    drilling for oil, gas, and minerals on several of Rankins’ properties. Below, the
    district court ordered Rankins to file an amended complaint, as Rankins’ initial
    complaint failed to “adequately allege diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
    * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-11372       Document: 00514569464          Page: 2     Date Filed: 07/24/2018
    No. 17-11372
    § 1332.” Rankins did so, but once again, Rankins failed to allege “any facts to
    show the place of incorporation and principal place of business of” McGowan
    Working Partners. Accordingly, the district court dismissed Rankins’ claims,
    and Rankins timely appeals.
    “The burden of establishing federal jurisdiction rests on the party
    seeking the federal forum.” 1 For diversity jurisdiction then, “the party
    asserting federal jurisdiction must ‘distinctly and affirmatively allege’ the
    citizenship of the parties.” 2 “‘Failure adequately to allege the basis for diversity
    jurisdiction mandates dismissal.’” 3 Rankins fails to meet his burden, as he does
    not plead the citizenship, place of incorporation, or principle place of business
    of McGowan Working Partners. Rankins’ opening brief does not address
    diversity jurisdiction, and the record is likewise deficient. The district court
    therefore properly dismissed Rankins’ claims.
    AFFIRMED.
    1 Howry v. Allstate Ins. Co., 
    243 F.3d 912
    , 919 (5th Cir. 2001).
    2 
    Id. (quoting Stafford
    v. Mobil Oil Corp., 
    945 F.2d 803
    , 804 (5th Cir. 1991))
    (brackets removed).
    3 
    Id. (quoting Stafford
    , 
    945 F.2d 805
    ).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-11372

Filed Date: 7/24/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/25/2018