Augustine Ikolo v. Kevin McAleenan, Acting Secy ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 19-60343      Document: 00515161171        Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/16/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    No. 19-60343                         October 16, 2019
    Summary Calendar
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    AUGUSTINE DAFE IKOLO, also known as Marcus Brown,
    also known as Mbuthelezi Mwokwena, also known as Frank Bones,
    also known as Daffy,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    KEVIN K. MCALEENAN,
    Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
    Respondent.
    Petition for Review of an Order of
    the Board of Immigration Appeals
    No. A 204 754 480
    Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
    5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-60343    Document: 00515161171        Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/16/2019
    No. 19-60343
    Augustine Ikolo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of
    an expedited removal order of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”).
    In response to DHS’s Notice of Intent to Issue a Final Administrative Removal
    Order, Ikolo requested withholding of removal under the Convention Against
    Torture. Ikolo contends that the DHS ignored his response and has failed to
    give him notice of any reasonable-fear proceedings. The government moves to
    dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
    We have jurisdiction to review a removal order that is “final.” See Flores-
    Ledezma v. Gonzales, 
    415 F.3d 375
    , 380 (5th Cir. 2005). Regardless of the
    parties’ agreement that Ikolo’s reasonable-fear interview has not been sched-
    uled since his request for withholding of removal in May, we lack jurisdiction
    to consider the petition for review because reasonable-fear proceedings have
    not yet concluded. See Ponce-Osorio v. Johnson, 
    824 F.3d 502
    , 505−06 (5th Cir.
    2016). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the petition is
    DISMISSED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-60343

Filed Date: 10/16/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/17/2019