United States v. Baquavious Rivers ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 19-10090      Document: 00515203471         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/18/2019
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-10090
    Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    November 18, 2019
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    BAQUAVIOUS RIVERS,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:17-CR-460-10
    Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The attorney appointed to represent Baquavious Rivers has moved for
    leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
    (5th Cir. 2011).
    Rivers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
    relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-10090    Document: 00515203471    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/18/2019
    No. 19-10090
    Our review reveals a clerical error in the written judgment concerning
    the indictment to which Rivers pleaded guilty. The judgment erroneously
    states that Rivers pleaded guilty to Count One of “the indictment filed on
    September 12, 2017,” rather than Count One of the second superseding
    indictment filed January 9, 2018.
    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
    counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
    DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited
    purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P.
    36; United States v. Johnson, 
    588 F.2d 961
    , 964 (5th Cir. 1979).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-10090

Filed Date: 11/18/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/19/2019