Green v. Friend ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-10719
    Conference Calendar
    ELBERT SILAS GREEN,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    PATTY FRIEND, Correctional Health Services,
    Tarrant County Correctional Center, Tarrant
    County Jail, Fort Worth, Texas; JOHN DOE,
    Correctional Health Services; JANE DOE,
    Correctional Health Services,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:98-CV-507-A
    - - - - - - - - - -
    December 15, 1999
    Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Elbert Silas Green, a Texas prisoner (# 764049), appeals
    from the district court’s order denying his motion for a
    temporary restraining order (“TRO”).   Insofar as Green is seeking
    a TRO, this court lacks jurisdiction over his appeal.    See
    Faulder v. Johnson, 
    178 F.3d 741
    , 742 (5th Cir. 1999).     Insofar
    as the TRO motion might be liberally construed as a motion for a
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 99-10719
    -2-
    preliminary injunction, Green has not remotely demonstrated that
    he might be able to satisfy any of the four prerequisites for the
    issuance of such relief.   See Lakedreams v. Taylor, 
    932 F.2d 1103
    , 1107 (5th Cir. 1991).    Regardless of which of those two
    ways this court interprets the motion, the appeal has no arguable
    merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    For purposes of the “three-strikes” provision, 28 U.S.C.
    § 1915(g), Green had already accumulated at least two strikes
    prior to the instant appeal.    See Green v. Lampert, No. 98-10732
    (5th Cir. Aug. 4, 1999) (affirmance of dismissal of complaint as
    frivolous); Green v. Wilder, No. 95-10756 (5th Cir. Oct. 18,
    1995) (dismissal of appeal as frivolous); see Adepegba v.
    Hammons, 
    103 F.3d 383
    , 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996) (dismissal of a
    complaint as frivolous counts as a “strike” under § 1915(g), as
    does the dismissal of an appeal as frivolous).    The instant
    dismissal counts as a third strike.    Accordingly, Green is warned
    that he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or
    appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility
    unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
    See § 1915(g).
    APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-10719

Filed Date: 12/16/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021