United States v. Eliott Dresher ( 2014 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 24 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50578
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01265-PSG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ELIOTT JAY DRESHER, a.k.a. Eliott
Dresher,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 21, 2014**
Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Eliott Jay Dresher appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the $8,880,389.05 order of restitution imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
12-50578
for mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Dresher’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Dresher
has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering
brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the restitution order.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Dresher’s request for
appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
2 12-50578