-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30747 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANA H. SAVARISTE, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-130-ALL - - - - - - - - - - April 10, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Dana H. Savariste appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He bases this contention on the affidavit of Lynette Felder, his girlfriend and the woman responsible for having him arrested on the instant charge after he had assaulted her. Felder’s affidavit was submitted ten months after the incident leading to Savariste’s arrest, and after she and Savariste had reconciled. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-30747 -2- The statements in the affidavit differ from statements given to the police by both Felder and Savariste at the time of the incident. Moreover, the totality of the circumstances indicates that Savariste’s decision to plead guilty was a tactical one, made with the assistance of competent counsel, and that he later decided that he had made a bad choice. Thus, he has not shown a fair and just reason for withdrawal of his guilty plea. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e); United States v. Carr,
740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Savariste’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. AFFIRMED.
Document Info
Docket Number: 00-30747
Filed Date: 4/10/2001
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/21/2014