United States v. Jorge De La Luz-Antonio , 349 F. App'x 977 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    October 22, 2009
    No. 09-10077
    Summary Calendar                Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JORGE DE LA LUZ-ANTONIO,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:08-CR-49-1
    Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Jorge De La Luz-Antonio (De La Luz) pleaded guilty to transporting illegal
    aliens.   The presentence report (PSR) set De La Luz’s offense level at 18
    pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) based on a finding that “the offense involved
    intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily
    injury to another person.” De La Luz appeals the enhancement, asserting that
    the adjustment should not have been applied because the aliens had access to
    *
    Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 09-10077
    oxygen, were not exposed to extreme temperatures, and could exit the vehicle
    quickly if necessary. See United States v. Zuniga-Amezquita, 
    468 F.3d 886
    , 889
    (5th Cir. 2006)(setting forth factors to be considered in applying this
    adjustment).
    Because the facts related to this adjustment are not in dispute, we review
    de novo the legal question of the applicability of the adjustment. United States
    v. Solis-Garcia, 
    420 F.3d 511
    , 514 (5th Cir. 2005). According to the PSR and the
    addendum, De La Luz was transporting 11 illegal aliens in a minivan rated for
    seven passengers. See United States v. Mateo Garza, 
    541 F.3d 290
    , 294 (5th Cir.
    2008)(indicating in dicta that a vehicle carrying four people more than its rating
    would “[p]robably” be considered “substantially more” than the rated capacity
    of the vehicle). Additionally, the rear seats of the vehicle had been removed, and
    the deputy sheriff who had stopped the vehicle identified five unsecured cinder
    blocks in the rear of the minivan, on which some of the aliens were sitting. The
    blocks could overturn or become projectiles in the event of an accident, which
    could cause injuries to an individual sitting on a cinder block or to others in the
    vehicle. See Zuniga-Amezquita, 
    468 F.3d at 890
    . Therefore, the aliens faced a
    greater “risk of injury . . . than that faced by an ordinary passenger, without a
    seatbelt.” 
    Id.
     In light of these aggravating factors, the district court’s imposition
    of the enhancement is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-10077

Citation Numbers: 349 F. App'x 977

Judges: Elrod, Jolly, Per Curiam, Wiener

Filed Date: 10/22/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023