Peggy Sanders-Redmiles v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 10-685V
    Filed: April 17, 2013
    ****************************
    PEGGY SANDERS-REDMILES,    *
    *
    Petitioner,  *                                        Attorney Fees and Costs
    v.                         *
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
    *
    Respondent.  *
    ****************************
    David C. Richards, Esq., Christensen & Jensen, P.C., Salt Lake City, UT, for petitioner.
    Alexis B. Babcock, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1
    Vowell, Special Master:
    In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 I issued
    a decision on September 28, 2012, that awarded compensation pursuant to the parties’
    joint stipulation. On March 29, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation for attorney fees and
    costs. The stipulation indicates that respondent does not object to the amount petitioner
    is requesting. Additionally, pursuant to General Order #9, the stipulation notes that
    petitioner incurred no personal litigation costs.
    I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a
    reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate,
    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
    to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (codified as amended at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and
    move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
    invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will
    delete such material from public access.
    2
    The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq.
    (2006).
    reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the total $75,000.003 in
    the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel of
    record, David C. Richards, for petitioner’s attorney fees and costs.
    The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/ Denise K. Vowell
    Denise K. Vowell
    Special Master
    3
    This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
    charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
    Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including
    costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 
    924 F.2d 1029
     (Fed. Cir.1991).
    4
    Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    See Vaccine Rule 11(a).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-685V

Filed Date: 4/17/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021