Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. DOWCP ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1549
    LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; RIFE & HALL COAL COMPANY,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
    STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CAROLYN JUSTUS, o/b/o and widow
    of Greley Justus,
    Respondents.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
    (13-0313-BLA; 13-0314-BLA)
    Submitted:   January 30, 2015                Decided:    February 23, 2015
    Before DUNCAN and    HARRIS,     Circuit   Judges,      and   DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John R. Sigmond, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Bristol, Tennessee,
    for Petitioners.   Joseph E. Wolfe, WOLFE WILLIAMS & REYNOLDS,
    Norton, Virginia; Sean Gregory Bajkowski, Sarah Marie Hurley,
    Richard Anthony Seid, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Rife & Hall Coal
    Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and
    order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of living
    miner benefits to former employee Greley Justus and survivor’s
    benefits to Justus’ surviving spouse, Carolyn Justus, under the
    Black    Lung    Benefits      Act,   
    30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945
         (2012).      Our
    review   of     the   record    discloses      that    the    Board’s   decision   is
    based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
    stated by the Board.            Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Office of
    Workers’ Comp. Programs, Nos. 13-0313-BLA & 13-0314-BLA (B.R.B.
    Apr. 9, 2014).        We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before   this     court   and    argument      would    not    aid   the   decisional
    process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1549

Filed Date: 2/23/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021