United States v. Fields ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-10331
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    VERSUS
    KEITH FIELDS, also known as James Johnson,
    also know as Keith Green, also known as Greasie,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
    District Court No. 3:99-CR-74-2-G
    January 2, 2001
    Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Keith Fields appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute
    cocaine in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    .      We modify his sentence,
    and, as modified, affirm.
    Fields was charged in a one-count indictment with conspiracy
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
    the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    1
    to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine.                  Fields pleaded
    guilty    and     the      district   court    sentenced    him    to    108   months’
    imprisonment, followed by a five year term of supervised release.
    On appeal, Fields challenges only the five-year supervised release
    term. Because Fields made no objection in district court to his
    term of supervised release, we review his present challenge for
    plain error.      United States v. Meshack, 
    225 F.3d 556
    , 575 (5th Cir.
    2000).
    A five-year term of supervised release is required in cases
    involving in excess of five kilograms of cocaine.                        
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b)(1)(B).           However, the statutory maximum term for cocaine
    possession which does not require some showing of drug amounts is
    three     years       of     supervised       release.       See    
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (b)(2)(providing for a term of supervised release of “not more
    than three years”); 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (b)(1)(C)(providing for a “term
    of supervised release of at least 3 years”); United States v.
    Kelly, 
    974 F.2d 22
    , 24-25 (5th Cir. 1992)(reducing a term of
    supervised release to three years by harmonizing the three-year
    minimum    in     §   841(b)(1)(C)      with    the   three-year        maximum   in   §
    3583(b)).       In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    120 S. Ct. 2348
     (2000), the
    Supreme Court held that any fact, other than a prior conviction,
    which increases the penalty for a crime, must be submitted to a
    jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.                 Because the government
    did not prove quantity beyond a reasonable doubt at the plea or
    2
    sentencing hearing, we find plain error in Fields’s sentence.   See
    Meshack, 
    225 F.3d at 578
    .   The government concedes that the term of
    supervised release is incorrect and should be adjusted.
    Because the only authorized term of supervised release for the
    offense of conviction is three years, there is no need for a
    remand.   See United States v. Vasquez, 
    504 F.2d 555
    , 556 (5th Cir.
    1974).    We therefore vacate Fields’s five-year term of supervised
    release and impose a three-year term of supervised release.      As
    modified, Fields’s sentence is affirmed.
    SENTENCE MODIFIED and, as modified, AFFIRMED.
    3