Alkasab v. Cleveland State Univ , 121 F. App'x 123 ( 2005 )

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0122n.06 Filed: February 15, 2005 No. 03-4435 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KALIL A. ALKASAB, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE Plaintiff-Appellant, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE v. ) NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ) OHIO CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY, ) ) MEMORANDUM Defendant-Appellee. ) OPINION BEFORE: NORRIS, GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; TODD, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Kalil A. Alkasab, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant, Cleveland State University, in this employment discrimination case. Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant. Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendant has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. * The Honorable James D. Todd, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation. No. 03-4435 Alkasav v. Cleveland State University Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that court in its Order and Decision dated September 26, 2003. -2-