-
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0253n.06 Filed: April 4, 2005 No. 04-1638 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT METODIJA DIMOVSKI, VALENTINA ) DIMOVSKA, and STEFAN DIMOVSKI, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT Petitioners-Appellants, ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN ) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN v. ) ) MEMORANDUM TOM RIDGE, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND ) OPINION SECURITY and JOHN A. MATA, FIELD ) DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND ) CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MIAMI, FLORIDA, ) Respondents-Appellees. BEFORE: NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and MILLS, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Petitioners appeal from an Order of the district court dismissing their petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dissolving a temporary stay of removal. Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in dismissing the petition and dissolving the stay of removal. Because the reasoning which supports the Order has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the Order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by * The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Court Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation. No. 04-1638 Dimovski v. Sec. Homeland Security that court in its Opinion and Order, dated April 13, 2004. We note that the district court’s reasoning is buttressed by an opinion issued by the Supreme Court after the district court’s opinion was filed, Rumsfeld v. Padilla,
124 S. Ct. 2711(2004). -2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 04-1638
Citation Numbers: 125 F. App'x 699
Filed Date: 4/4/2005
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023