United States v. Cephus ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-50177
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ANTHONY LEON CEPHUS, also
    known as Anthony L. Cephus,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. W-97-CR-62-1
    - - - - - - - - - -
    October 21, 1999
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Anthony Leon Cephus appeals the district court’s revocation
    of his supervised release.    He argues that the district court
    abused its discretion in revoking his supervised release because
    the Government failed to offer sufficient evidence to establish a
    nexus between himself and the plastic bag containing the “crack”
    cocaine found in his backyard.
    Supervised release may be revoked upon a finding, by a
    preponderance of the evidence, that a defendant violated a
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 99-50177
    -2-
    condition of his supervised release.   18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3);
    United States v. McCormick, 
    54 F.3d 214
    , 219 (5th Cir. 1995).
    This court reviews the district court’s decision for an abuse of
    discretion.   
    Id. In considering
    a challenge to the sufficiency of the
    evidence, this court views “the evidence and all reasonable
    inferences that may be drawn from the evidence in a light most
    favorable to the government."   United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz, 
    38 F.3d 788
    , 792 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal citation omitted).    This
    court does not pass on a district court's determination   as to
    the credibility of the witnesses.   
    Id. at 791.
      Accepting all
    reasonable credibility choices that tend to support the judge’s
    decision, the evidence, when viewed in its entirety, is
    sufficient to establish that Cephus violated the conditions of
    his supervised release.   United States v. Cardenas, 
    748 F.2d 1015
    , 1020 (5th Cir. 1984).
    AFFIRMED.