United States v. Reagan ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-41407
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    RYAN CHRISTOPHER REAGAN
    Defendant - Appellant
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:00-CR-9-ALL
    --------------------
    June 26, 2001
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Ryan Christopher Reagan appeals his guilty plea conviction
    for bank robbery in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 2113
    (a).     Reagan
    argues that the district court improperly assigned a two-level
    sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) for using a
    threat of death during the course of the robbery and that the
    district court’s imposition of a $1,500 fine was error.
    Section 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides
    that when a defendant uses a threat of death as part of a bank
    robbery, a two-level enhancement applies.     The threat of death
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 00-41407
    -2-
    may be an oral or written statement, an act, a gesture, or a
    combination thereof.   U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1, comment. (n.6).   In
    committing the robbery, Reagan passed a note to the bank teller
    stating that, if she did not hand over all the money in the
    drawer, “I do have a device that will hurt a great deal,” he had
    his right hand in his pocket, and the Government introduced
    testimony that the bank teller feared for her life.   The district
    court did not err in applying U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F).
    The district court’s imposition of a fine $6,000 less than
    that recommended in the PSR is not clearly erroneous and is
    specifically authorized by U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(e).   See United
    States v. O’Banion, 
    943 F.2d 1422
    , 1431-32 (5th Cir. 1991).     The
    judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-41407

Filed Date: 6/27/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021