Rader v. Weber ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-10486
    Summary Calendar
    TERRY DON RADER,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    GARRY WEBER; GLENN NOWLIN; SUSAN SLOVAK;
    WEBER INVESTMENT CORPORATION,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:02-CV-23-P
    --------------------
    December 27, 2002
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Terry Don Rader appeals the district court’s dismissal for
    lack of subject-matter jurisdiction of his claims against the
    defendants arising under the securities laws.    He asserts that
    the defendants made false statements that caused him loss, in
    violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5.    Rader
    has not established that he was induced into buying or selling
    securities based upon the allegedly false statements made by the
    defendants or that any transaction entered by Rader resulted in
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 02-10486
    -2-
    loss.   See Santa Fe Indus. v. Green, 
    430 U.S. 462
    , 476 (1977);
    Reid v. Hughes, 
    578 F.2d 634
    , 636 (5th Cir. 1978).   As a result,
    the district court lacked authority to adjudicate the case.     See
    Home Builders Ass’n of Miss. v. City of Madison, Miss., 
    143 F.3d 1006
    , 1010 (5th Cir. 1998); Carpenter v. Wichita Falls Indep.
    Sch. Dist., 
    44 F.3d 362
    , 366 (5th Cir. 1995).   Accordingly, the
    judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.