Wells v. Edwards , 190 F. App'x 343 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 21, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-41846
    Conference Calendar
    MARSHALL WELLS,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    JACKIE EDWARDS, Warden of Ramsey III; UNKNOWN REGIONAL DIRECTORS
    at DARRINGTON UNIT 59; PRIGE JACK, Grievance Coordinator of
    Ramsey III Unit; SUSAN RIVAS; CAROLYN C. FIELDS,
    Supervisor of the Mailroom at Ramsey III Unit; REGINA
    HIGGINS, Clerk of Ramsey III Mailroom; ANTON POWELL, Clerk
    of Ramsey III Mailroom; SHEKI MURPHY, Clerk of Ramsey III
    Mailroom,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:05-CV-558
    --------------------
    Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Marshall Wells, Texas prisoner # 314821, appeals from the
    district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as
    time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).    Wells concedes
    that he previously filed the same complaint against the same
    defendants and that it was voluntarily dismissed pursuant to his
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-41846
    -2-
    “Notice of Dismissal” filed on August 19, 2003.   Wells also
    concedes that his cause of action arose when he received the
    final response to his Step Two Grievance in 1999.   See Jackson v.
    Johnson, 
    950 F.2d 263
    , 265 (5th Cir. 1992).   The applicable
    statute of limitations is two years.   See Hitt v. Connell, 
    301 F.3d 240
    , 246 (5th Cir. 2002).   Wells’s voluntary dismissal of
    that complaint left him in the same position as if the lawsuit
    had never been filed.   Lambert v. United States, 
    44 F.3d 296
    , 298
    (5th Cir. 1995).   Equitable tolling is not warranted in this case
    because Wells failed to act diligently to preserve his claims.
    See 
    id. at 299
    & 299 n.1.   Wells’s complaint filed in September
    2005 was therefore untimely.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-41846

Citation Numbers: 190 F. App'x 343

Judges: Dennis, Owen, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 6/21/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023