Streett v. State , 914 S.W.2d 51 ( 1996 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Toby Streett appeals his conviction for violating an ex parte order of protection. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and complains that his due process rights were violated because the state did not make an opening statement at trial. We affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential purpose in publishing a written opinion, we issue this summary order. We include for the parties a memorandum explaining the basis for our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).