NLRB v. Lori Irish , 677 F. App'x 309 ( 2017 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 30 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS Nos. 13-17409
BOARD, 14-15054
Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01747-LRH-
CWH
v.
LORI IRISH, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 18, 2017**
Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Lori Irish appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motion
for release of seized funds in the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”)
action to satisfy a prior judgment entered against Irish. We dismiss.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
As both parties concede, the district court has not addressed all of the issues
necessary to reach a final resolution in this action. Accordingly, we lack
jurisdiction to review the district court’s order because it was not final under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. See Nat’l Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 117
F.3d 432, 433 (9th Cir. 1997) (“A ruling is final for purposes of § 1291 if it (1) is a
full adjudication of the issues, and (2) clearly evidences the judge’s intention that it
be the court’s final act in the matter.” (citation and internal quotation marks
omitted)); see also United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, 235 F.3d 443, 448 (9th
Cir. 2000) (“A final decision is one that ends the litigation on the merits and leaves
nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment. ” (citations and internal
quotation marks omitted)).
Irish’s motion for the NLRB to supply a copy of her deposition is denied.
DISMISSED.
2 14-15054