United States v. Ceniceros , 349 F. App'x 948 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    October 21, 2009
    No. 08-51124
    Summary Calendar                Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    GENARO CENICEROS,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:08-CR-1209-1
    Before KING, STEWART and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Genaro Ceniceros pleaded guilty to importing and possessing with intent
    to distribute marijuana. The district court sentenced Ceniceros to 21 months of
    imprisonment, a term at the bottom of the guidelines range. Ceniceros appeals
    his sentence, arguing that he was entitled to a two-level reduction in his offense
    level under U.S.S.G § 3B1.2(b) as a minor participant in the drug-trafficking
    operation.
    *
    Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-51124
    Ceniceros has not met his burden to establish that he played only a minor
    role in the offense. See Burton v. United States, 
    237 F.3d 490
    , 503 (5th Cir.
    2000). Ceniceros’s sentence was based entirely on the conduct that he was
    directly involved in and the quantity of drugs that he personally transported;
    thus, a minor-role adjustment was not required even if he played only a small
    part in a large enterprise. See United States v. Garcia, 
    242 F.3d 593
    , 598-99 (5th
    Cir. 2001); United States v. Atanda, 
    60 F.3d 196
    , 199 (5th Cir. 1995). In any
    event, Ceniceros’s argument that he should have received the adjustment
    because he was merely a drug courier with little knowledge of the smuggling
    operation is unavailing. A courier is often “indispensable” to a drug-smuggling
    operation, United States v. Buenrostro, 
    868 F.2d 135
    , 138 (5th Cir. 1989), and
    thus is not automatically entitled to a minor-role adjustment. United States v.
    Jenkins, 
    487 F.3d 279
    , 282 (5th Cir. 2007). Ceniceros’s role in transporting over
    25 kilograms of drugs across the border was more than peripheral; therefore, the
    district court did not clearly err in finding that he was not a minor participant.
    See United States v. Villanueva, 
    408 F.3d 193
    , 203-04 (5th Cir. 2005).
    The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-51124

Citation Numbers: 349 F. App'x 948

Judges: Haynes, King, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/21/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023