Dedeaux v. Foster ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-60198
    Summary Calendar
    JOHN JOSEPH DEDEAUX, SR.,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    BETTY FOSTER, Etc.; ET AL.,
    Defendants,
    BETTY FOSTER, Mail Inspector at Parchman,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Mississippi
    (4:99-CV-237-B-D)
    _________________________________________________________________
    October 7, 2002
    Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    A    district   judge   granted   judgment   as   a   matter   of   law
    dismissing as frivolous a civil rights action brought by John
    Joseph Dedeaux, Sr., Mississippi prisoner no. 93417, against Betty
    Foster.    Three other defendants had already been dismissed for
    Dedeaux’s failure to state a cause of action against them under 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
    .       The district judge denied Dedeaux’s motion to
    proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) and certified that the
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    appeal was not taken in good faith under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (a)(3) and
    FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3).   Dedeaux now seeks leave from this court
    to appeal IFP.   See Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
     (5th Cir. 1997).
    Dedeaux does not address the reasons for the district court’s
    certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith.            He
    therefore has waived the only issue relevant to his IFP motion. See
    Yohey v. Collins, 
    985 F.2d 222
    , 225 (5th Cir. 1993) (issues not
    briefed are abandoned). Dedeaux fails to show that he would present
    any nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
    His motion to proceed IFP       is   DENIED, and his appeal is
    DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    DENIED AND DISMISSED
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-60198

Filed Date: 10/8/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021