Richard Lawler v. Ms Department of Corrections, Et , 448 F. App'x 450 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 10-60975     Document: 00511651077         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/01/2011
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    November 1, 2011
    No. 10-60975
    Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    RICHARD DONALD LAWLER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LUTHER THAXTON,
    Individually and in his official capacity; CHRISTOPHER EPPS,
    Defendants - Appellees
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Mississippi
    USDC No. 3:09-CV-135
    Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Richard Donald Lawler, Mississippi prisoner # 54271, proceeding pro se
    in this 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action, challenges its dismissal for untimeliness. (Two
    other defendants, the Mississippi Department of Corrections and Christopher
    Epps, were dismissed in district court pursuant to Lawler’s voluntary motion for
    dismissal. He has not challenged that dismissal, but they filed briefs here in the
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-60975    Document: 00511651077      Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/01/2011
    No. 10-60975
    abundance of caution.) Such a dismissal is reviewed de novo. E.g.,
    Sanders-Burns v. City of Plano, 
    594 F.3d 366
    , 372 (5th Cir. 2010).
    Lawler contends this action is not untimely because it should be
    considered filed in October 2006, when he filed a complaint concerning the same
    acts. The October 2006 complaint, which was dismissed without prejudice, “has
    no legal effect” and is not a factor in the timeliness equation. Dawson Farms,
    LLC v. Farm Serv. Agency, 
    504 F.3d 592
    , 601 (5th Cir. 2007).
    Congress has not provided a limitations period for § 1983 actions.
    Therefore, in those actions, federal courts are to borrow the general personal-
    injury limitations period of the forum state. E.g., Cuvillier v. Taylor, 
    503 F.3d 397
    , 401 (5th Cir. 2007). In Mississippi, the general personal-injury statute of
    limitations is three years. See Walker v. Epps, 
    550 F.3d 407
    , 415 (5th Cir. 2008).
    The action at hand was filed more than three years after Lawler’s claim
    accrued, and he has not shown he is entitled to equitable tolling or any other
    tolling provision. See Peavey Elec. Corp. v. Baan U.S.A., Inc., 
    10 So. 3d 945
    , 953-
    54 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-60975

Citation Numbers: 448 F. App'x 450

Judges: Barksdale, Per Curiam, Prado, Stewart

Filed Date: 11/1/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023