United States v. Carmichael Febabor ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 98-1863
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    *
    v.                                * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    Carmichael Amaebi Febabor, also        * District of Minnesota.
    known as Andrew Tony Dole, also        *
    known as Charles Lyon Butler, also     *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    known as Robert Martin Smith,          *
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 29, 1998
    Filed: October 5, 1998
    ___________
    Before FAGG, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Carmichael Amaebi Febabor appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1
    following his guilty plea to conspiring to launder money, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
    § 1956(h). After denying Febabor&s motion for a downward departure, the court
    sentenced Febabor at the bottom of the applicable range to 24 months imprisonment
    1
    The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge for the
    District of Minnesota.
    and three years supervised release. The court also ordered Febabor to pay $269,288
    in restitution jointly and severally with a co-defendant. This appeal followed. After
    appellate counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), we granted Febabor permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, but he has
    not done so.
    The district court&s denial of Febabor&s motion for a downward departure is
    unreviewable, see United States v. Fischl, 
    16 F.3d 927
    , 929 (8th Cir. 1994) (district
    court&s failure to grant defendant downward departure is not reviewable on appeal if
    court was aware of its authority to grant departure), and we believe the court&s order
    of restitution was not an abuse of discretion, see United States v. French, 
    46 F.3d 710
    ,
    716 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review).
    Upon review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80
    (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
    Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-