Ralph Blumberg v. Nationwide Life Ins. ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 99-2135
    ___________
    Ralph Blumberg; Geraldine Blumberg;  *
    Robert Blumberg,                     *
    *
    Appellants,              * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    v.                             * Eastern District of Missouri.
    *
    Nationwide Life Insurance Company,   *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: February 11, 2000
    Filed: February 17, 2000
    ___________
    Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Robert Blumberg and his parents, Ralph and Geraldine Blumberg, appeal
    following the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to Nationwide Life Insurance
    Company (Nationwide) in their declaratory-judgment and tort action. After careful
    review of the record, we deny the Blumbergs’ motion to strike a portion of
    Nationwide’s brief, and we conclude the district court did not err in granting summary
    1
    The Honorable Lawrence O. Davis, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
    judgment. Nationwide never received an application or issued a policy for the
    insurance in question, and the agent with whom the Blumbergs dealt lacked actual
    authority to bind Nationwide. We conclude the Blumbergs did not create a genuine
    issue of material fact as to whether the agent had apparent authority to bind Nationwide
    or whether Nationwide could be held liable for the agent’s alleged tortious acts. See
    Hunt v. Mercy Med. Ctr., 
    710 A.2d 362
    , 376 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1998); Veydt v.
    Lincoln Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 
    614 A.2d 1318
    , 1322 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992); Simpson
    v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 
    177 A.2d 417
    , 421 (Md. 1962).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-