Rolf A. Rosendahl v. Mel Carnahan ( 2000 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2525
___________
Bobby Dean Lewis; Donald Glenn *
Cammann; Benjamin Kind; Stanley Paul *
Smith; Richard F. Toler; *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
Rolf A. Rosendahl; *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
*
Jerome Hunter; Paul Joseph Koppi, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. * Appeals from the United States
* District Court for the Western
Mel Carnahan; Dora Schriro; Paul * District of Missouri.
Herman; George Lombardi; R. Dale *
Riley; Steven E. Moore; Darin Morgan; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Jennifer Miller, *
*
Defendants-Appellees. *
____________________ *
*
Bobby Dean Lewis; Benjamin Kind; *
Stanley Paul Smith; Richard F. Toler; *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
Rolf A. Rosendahl; *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
*
Jerome Hunter; Paul Joseph Koppi; *
Donald Glenn Cammann, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. *
*
Mel Carnahan; Dora B. Schriro; Paul *
Herman; George A. Lombardi; R. Dale *
Riley; Steven E. Moore; Darin Morgan; *
Jennifer Miller, *
*
Defendants-Appellees. *
__________
No. 99-2526
__________
Bobby Dean Lewis; Donald Glenn *
Cammann; Benjamin Kind; *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
Stanley Paul Smith; *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
*
Richard F. Toler; Rolf A. Rosendahl; *
Jerome Hunter; Paul Joseph Koppi, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. *
*
-2-
Mel Carnahan; Dora B. Schriro; Paul *
Herman; George Lombardi; R. Dale *
Riley; Steven E. Moore; Darin Morgan; *
Jennifer Miller, *
*
Defendants-Appellees. *
__________
No. 99-2527
__________
Bobby Dean Lewis; *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
*
Benjamin Kind; Stanley Paul Smith; *
Richard F. Toler; Rolf A. Rosendahl; *
Jerome Hunter; Paul Joseph Koppi; *
Donald Glenn Cammann, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. *
*
Mel Carnahan; Dora B. Schriro; Paul *
Herman; George A. Lombardi; R. Dale *
Riley; Steven E. Moore; Darin Morgan; *
Jennifer Miller, *
*
Defendants-Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 4, 2000
Filed: February 8, 2000
___________
-3-
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri inmates Bobby Dean Lewis, Rolf A. Rosendahl, and Stanley Paul
Smith appeal from orders dismissing two identical versions of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district courts' orders
were correct, and these consolidated appeals are entirely without merit. Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-4-