Robert Wilson v. Nancy H. Evans , 18 F. App'x 442 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 01-1791
    ___________
    Robert Wilson,                            *
    *
    Appellant,                   *
    *
    v.                                 *
    *
    Nancy H. Evans, Public Safety             *
    Commissioner of the City of Cedar         *
    Rapids, individually and in her official * Appeal from the United States
    capacity; Cedar Rapids Police             * District Court for the
    Department, sued as The Cedar Rapids * Northern District of Iowa.
    City Police Department; City of Cedar *
    Rapids; Brian Bean, police officer of     *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    the City of Cedar Rapids, individually; *
    Graham Campshure, police officer of       *
    the City of Cedar Rapids, individually; *
    Four Unidentified and Unnamed             *
    Officers, Cedar Rapids Police             *
    Department, individually,                 *
    *
    Appellees.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: August 30, 2001
    Filed: September 4, 2001
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Robert Wilson appeals the District Court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
    in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action claiming violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth
    Amendments. He alleges that because he is African American, he was twice stopped
    and detained by City of Cedar Rapids (City) police officers for no legitimate purpose,
    and on one occasion they required him to provide his personal identifying information
    when he tried to report a crime. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Smith v.
    Watkins, 
    159 F.3d 1137
    , 1138 (8th Cir. 1998) (de novo standard of review), we affirm.
    Although the city ordinance infractions upon which the challenged stops were
    based appear minor, Wilson fails to establish that the stops were unconstitutional or
    that the scope of the stops was excessive. Cf. United States v. Beck, 
    140 F.3d 1129
    ,
    1133-34 (8th Cir. 1998) (affirming that even minor traffic violation creates probable
    cause to stop vehicle; during investigative traffic stops, officers may ask for
    identification, request explanation for presence in area, and conduct computer checks).
    Further, Wilson’s evidence falls short of showing that City police officers targeted
    African Americans or engaged in racial profiling, or that City police officers treated
    similarly situated whites differently.
    We also conclude that Wilson cannot seek reversal in this civil matter on a claim
    of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson, 
    855 F.2d 536
    , 541 (8th
    Cir. 1988) (holding that defendant has no constitutional or statutory right to effective
    assistance of counsel in a civil case). Finally, the district court did not abuse its
    discretion in awarding costs to defendants. See Firefighters’ Inst. for Racial Equal. v.
    City of St. Louis, 
    220 F.3d 898
    , 905 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), cert. denied,
    
    121 S. Ct. 1359
     (2001).
    1
    The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the
    Northern District of Iowa.
    -2-
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-1791

Citation Numbers: 18 F. App'x 442

Filed Date: 9/4/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023