United States v. Coleman ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    _____________________
    No. 95-40132
    Summary Calendar
    _____________________
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RUSSELL KENTON COLEMAN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:94-CR-57-1
    _________________________________________________________________
    November 28, 1995
    Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    The appellant appeals from a judgment of conviction on five
    firearms counts.    He argues that his confession was not voluntary,
    that his confession was not corroborated, and that he should have
    been permitted to put on a "mistake of law" defense.
    The district court did not err in holding the confession to be
    voluntary.     See United States v. Scurlock, 
    52 F.3d 531
    , 536 (5th
    *
    Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that
    have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on
    the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
    expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."
    Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion
    should not be published.
    Cir. 1995).   Adequate corroboration is in the record.   See United
    States v. Crawford, 
    52 F.3d 1303
    , 1309 (5th Cir. 1995); United
    States v. Devoll, 
    39 F.3d 575
    , 581 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied,
    
    115 S.Ct. 1701
     (1995).   "Mistake of law" is no defense.    United
    States v. Merkt, 
    764 F.2d 266
    , 273 (5th Cir. 1985).
    A F F I R M E D.
    -2-