United States v. Jose Cruz-Garcia , 582 F. App'x 412 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •      Case: 14-40053      Document: 00512773955         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/18/2014
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    United States Court of Appeals
    No. 14-40053
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    Summary Calendar                     September 18, 2014
    Lyle W. Cayce
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                      Clerk
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JOSE ELVIN CRUZ-GARCIA, also known as Elvin Cruz,
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:13-CR-567
    Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM: *
    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Elvin Cruz-
    Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
    with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
    632 F.3d 229
     (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Garcia has filed a response. Insofar as Cruz-
    Garcia alleges that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance with
    respect to the state court documents concerning his prior California conviction
    * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
    CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40053     Document: 00512773955      Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/18/2014
    No. 14-40053
    for assault with a deadly weapon, the record is not sufficiently developed to
    allow us to make a fair evaluation of the claim; we therefore decline to consider
    the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,
    
    739 F.3d 829
    , 841 (5th Cir. 2014), petition for cert. filed (June 4, 2014) (No. 13-
    10484).
    We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
    reflected therein, as well as Cruz-Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s
    assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
    from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
    5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-40053

Citation Numbers: 582 F. App'x 412

Filed Date: 9/18/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023