United States v. DeLeon ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                       IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-40588
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RAUL DELEON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. B-95-CR-24-1
    - - - - - - - - - -
    June 14, 1996
    Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Raul DeLeon appeals the denial of his pretrial motion to
    suppress evidence seized by State Trooper Oscar Cruz during an
    investigatory traffic stop.                   DeLeon contends that Cruz had no objective
    reason to stop him because, under Texas law, the display of a partially torn temporary "buyer’s"
    license tag is not illegal and does not give rise to a reasonable suspicion that he was in violation of
    any law. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities
    *
    Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
    47.5.4.
    No. 95-40588
    - 2 -
    convince us that the district court committed no reversible
    error.     Cruz was justified in stopping DeLeon to investigate the
    validity of his temporary license tag.                     See Green v. State, 
    866 S.W.2d 701
    , 703 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993); Kennedy v. State, 
    847 S.W.2d 635
    , 636 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993).
    DeLeon’s arguments that the district court erred in denying his motion to
    suppress because his detention subsequent to the initial
    investigation exceeded the scope and purpose of the initial stop
    and that he did not give voluntary consent to the search do not
    show that the district court committed plain error.                           United States v.
    Olano, 
    507 U.S. 725
    , 731-37 (1993)), cert. denied, 
    115 S. Ct. 1266
    (1995); United States v.
    Calverley, 
    37 F.3d 160
    , 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc).
    AFFIRMED.