United States v. Bugg , 269 F. App'x 382 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    March 6, 2008
    No. 07-10774                     Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Summary Calendar                           Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    KENNETH LEE BUGG
    Defendant - Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:99-cr-00079
    Before STEWART, OWEN and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Kenneth Lee Bugg appeals his sentence of fourteen months’ imprisonment,
    followed by thirty-four months of supervised release, because the period of
    supervised release exceeds the maximum permissible term by one day. In its
    Unopposed Motion to Modify the Judgment and Dismiss the Appeal, the
    government concedes that the district court’s sentence exceeds the maximum
    term of supervised release permitted under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h).                          The
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 07-10774
    government asks that we modify the district court judgment by reducing Bugg’s
    supervised release term by one day and then dismiss Bugg’s appeal; Bugg agrees
    that such a disposition would satisfactorily resolve his appeal.
    Despite the parties’ agreement, we are mindful that determining the
    proper sentence for a criminal defendant is a discretionary matter reserved to
    the district court. See United States v. Levario-Quiroz, 
    161 F.3d 903
    , 908-09 (5th
    Cir. 1998). Because the term of supervised release imposed in this case exceeds
    the statutory maximum, we VACATE Bugg’s supervised release sentence and
    REMAND for re-sentencing in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h).
    In light of our decision to vacate and remand, the government’s Unopposed
    Motion to Modify the Judgment and Dismiss the Appeal is DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-10774

Citation Numbers: 269 F. App'x 382

Judges: Owen, Per Curiam, Southwick, Stewart

Filed Date: 3/6/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023