Banks v. Morris , 115 F. App'x 704 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 17, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-30557
    Conference Calendar
    TYRONE BANKS,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    UNKNOWN MORRIS; UNKNOWN GRIMES; UNKNOWN HILL;
    C. M. LENSING,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Louisiana
    USDC No. 3:03-CV-1056-C
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Tyrone Banks, Louisiana inmate # 109878, has filed a motion
    in this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of
    the dismissal of his civil rights complaint under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e)(2)(B)(ii) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e for failure to state a
    claim.   Banks’s claim that he was served food loaf for seven days
    does not implicate a liberty interest; he has not shown that he
    will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal or that the district
    court erred in certifying that his appeal was not taken in good
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-30557
    -2-
    faith.   See Sandin v. Conner, 
    515 U.S. 472
    , 484 (1995); Howard v.
    King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).   Accordingly, Banks’s
    motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is
    DISMISSED as frivolous.    Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    , 202 n.24
    (5th Cir. 1997); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    The dismissal of this appeal and the district court’s
    dismissal of Banks’s complaint count as strikes under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g).    See Adepegba v. Hammons, 
    103 F.3d 383
    , 387-88 (5th
    Cir. 1996).   Banks previously earned a strike in another civil
    rights action.    See Banks v. Cain, No. 03-310-D-M1 (M.D. La. Aug.
    12, 2003); Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 387-88.   Because Banks has
    accumulated three strikes under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g), he is BARRED
    from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he
    is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under
    imminent danger of serious physical injury.    See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g).
    IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g) BAR
    IMPOSED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-30557

Citation Numbers: 115 F. App'x 704

Judges: Clement, DeMOSS, King, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/17/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023