eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 Federal Courts
 US Court of Appeals Cases
 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
 1998-03

Oubre v. Entergy Operations ( 1998 )


Menu:
 
  •                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 96-30654
Summary Calendar
DOLORES M. OUBRE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Louisiana
March 10, 1998
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Dolores M. Oubre filed suit against Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) on
September 26, 1995.      Oubre alleged that she was constructively discharged from
employment by Entergy in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
(ADEA),
    29 U.S.C. § 621
    , et seq. and LSA-R.S. 23: 972 and 51: 2231, et seq. Entergy
filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Oubre had waived her right
to bring this action by executing a release which waived all claims relating to her
employment. Entergy further argued that Oubre ratified the release by accepting and
not returning the consideration given to her in exchange for her execution of the release.
1
The district court granted Entergy’s motion in accordance with our decisions in
Blakeney v. Lomas Information Systems, Inc.,
    65 F.3d 482
     (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied,
    116 S.Ct. 1042
     (1996), and Wamsley v. Champlin Refining & Chemicals, Inc.,
    11 F.3d 534
     (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied,
    115 S.Ct. 1403
     (1995). We affirmed. See Oubre v.
Entergy Operations, Inc., No. 96-30654 (5th Cir. Nov. 6, 1996) (per curiam).      The
Supreme Court reversed. See Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.,
    118 S.Ct. 838
     (1998).
Accordingly, the district court’s order of May 23, 1996, granting summary
judgment is REVERSED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings
consistent with the Supreme Court’s pronouncement.
2