Jesse Furr/Stanley v. Greg Harmon , 176 F. App'x 704 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1079
    ___________
    Jesse Robert Furr/Stanley,              *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    *
    v.                                *
    *
    Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas * Appeal from the United States
    Regional Unit, ADC; Tommy James,        * District Court for the
    Assistant Warden, Maximum Security * Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Unit, ADC; Anderson, Dr., Maximum *
    Security Unit, ADC; James I. Cagle,     *
    Dr., Arkansas Department of             * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Correction; Sarah Speer, Infirmary      *
    Manager or Staff Personnel, Alexander *
    Youth Center; Correctional Medical      *
    Services; Pinkston, RNP, Maximum        *
    Security Unit, ADC; C. Green, RN,       *
    Unit Infirmary Manager, Maximum         *
    Security Unit, ADC,                     *
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 23, 2004
    Filed: April 11, 2006
    ___________
    Before BYE, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Jesse Robert Furr/Stanley (Furr), an inmate at the Tucker Maximum Security
    Unit in Arkansas, appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal without prejudice
    of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on
    appeal and for appointment of counsel. We grant Furr leave to proceed IFP, assessing
    the filing fee and leaving the collection details to the district court, see Henderson v.
    Norris, 
    129 F.3d 481
    , 484-85 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam), and we deny appointment
    of counsel.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper
    because we agree with the district court that Furr failed to fully exhaust his
    administrative remedies as to all his claims. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (dismissal
    required where inmate fails to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit);
    Johnson v. Jones, 
    340 F.3d 624
    , 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (dismissal required when inmate
    has not administratively exhausted before filing lawsuit); Graves v. Norris, 
    218 F.3d 884
    , 885-86 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (dismissal proper where at least some claims
    unexhausted).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
    Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the findings and recommendations of the
    Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
    of Arkansas.
    -2-