United States v. Brown , 120 F. App'x 558 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                              United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                     February 16, 2005
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-60528
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    LARRY D. BROWN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Mississippi
    USDC No. 1:03-CR-110-ALL
    Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Larry D. Brown appeals his conviction following a jury
    trial for being a felon in possession of a firearm, 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1).      Brown argues that the district court abused its
    discretion in admitting evidence of his involvement in counter-
    feiting and impersonation of a police officer.
    Because the challenged evidence “complete[d] the story of
    the crime” and was “‘inextricably intertwined’” with the evidence
    of the crime charged, the evidence was “intrinsic” evidence.               See
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    United   States   v.   Coleman,   
    78 F.3d 154
    ,   156   (5th   Cir.   1996)
    (citations omitted); United States v. Dale, 
    374 F.3d 321
    , 325 (5th
    Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (Nov. 8, 2004) (No. 04-7184).
    Brown has failed to show that the district court abused its
    discretion in admitting this evidence, the probative value of which
    was   not   substantially   outweighed      by    any   potential    for    undue
    prejudice.    See FED. R. EVID. 403.       Brown’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-60528

Citation Numbers: 120 F. App'x 558

Judges: Barksdale, Jones, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 2/16/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023