United States v. Castanon , 115 F. App'x 227 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 16, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-50297
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RENE GUILLERMO CASTANON,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. EP-03-CR-659-1-DB
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Rene Guillermo Castanon appeals from his conviction of
    possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine.      Castanon,
    for the first time on appeal, contends that the adjustments to
    his offense level violated Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
    (2004), and constituted plain error.   Castanon correctly concedes
    that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 
    377 F.3d 464
     (2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004)
    (No. 04-5263), but he raises the issue to preserve it for further
    review.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-50297
    -2-
    Castanon contends that the district court erred by not
    awarding him a two-level “safety-valve” adjustment; by adjusting
    his offense level for an aggravating role; and by failing to
    adjust his offense level for a mitigating role.   Castanon argues
    that his waiver of the right to appeal his sentence was unknowing
    and involuntary because he suffered from unspecified psychiatric
    problems.
    The record indicates that Castanon’s waiver was knowing and
    voluntary.   See United States v. Robinson, 
    187 F.3d 516
    , 518
    & n.2 (5th Cir. 1999).   The record does not support Castanon’s
    assertion that he was impaired by a psychiatric condition.
    Because Castanon waived the right to appeal his sentence, we do
    not address his contentions regarding application of the
    sentencing guidelines.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-50297

Citation Numbers: 115 F. App'x 227

Judges: Clement, DeMOSS, King, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/16/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023