United States v. Kelley , 168 F. App'x 656 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 February 23, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-41255
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DANIEL MICHAEL KELLEY,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:91-CR-47-1
    USDC No. 1:91-CR-48-1
    --------------------
    Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Daniel Michael Kelley, federal prisoner # 03456-078, appeals
    from the denial of his 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) motion for a
    reduction in his sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act
    (ACCA), 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (e)(1), and its corresponding Sentencing
    Guidelines provision, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4.
    Kelley argues that U.S.S.G. App. C, amend. 599 should be
    applied to reduce his ACCA sentence.   However, that provision is
    inapplicable to § 4B1.4, see United States v. Sanders, 372 F.3d
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-41255
    -2-
    1183, 1186 (10th Cir. 2004), and the denial of Kelley’s 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) motion was not an abuse of discretion.     See United
    States v. Shaw, 
    30 F.3d 26
    , 28-29 (5th Cir. 1994).
    Kelley contends for the first time in a letter pursuant to
    FED. R. APP. P. 28(j), submitted after the Government filed its
    brief, that U.S.S.G. App. C, amend. 674, which became effective
    November 1, 2004, should apply to his case and result in
    reduction of his sentence.    We need not consider Kelley’s
    argument, as it was raised for the first time in a Rule 28(j)
    letter.   See United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos, 
    412 F.3d 572
    ,
    577 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied,          S. Ct.   (Jan. 17, 2006)
    (No. 05-484).   Kelley has filed a “motion to compel performance
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1361
    .”    Kelley’s motion is denied.
    AFFIRMED; MOTION TO COMPEL DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-41255

Citation Numbers: 168 F. App'x 656

Judges: Dennis, Garza, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 2/23/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023