United States v. Betancourt-Ochoa , 169 F. App'x 280 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  February 23, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-41006
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    TOMAS BETANCOURT-OCHOA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 1:05-CR-180-ALL
    --------------------
    Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Tomas Betancourt-Ochoa (Betancourt) pleaded guilty to
    unlawful presence in the United States following deportation
    after having been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation
    of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (a) and (b).    The district court sentenced him
    to 37 months of imprisonment, to be followed by three years of
    supervised release.
    Betancourt challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s
    treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as
    sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-41006
    -2-
    be found by a jury.   We decline ruling on the applicability of
    the waiver provisions in Betancourt’s plea agreement because his
    constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
    United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    , 235 (1998).   Although Betancourt
    contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that
    a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres
    in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
     (2000), we have
    repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that
    Almendarez-Torres remains binding.   See United States v.
    Garza-Lopez, 
    410 F.3d 268
    , 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    126 S. Ct. 298
     (2005).   Betancourt properly concedes that his argument
    is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit
    precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further
    review.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-41006

Citation Numbers: 169 F. App'x 280

Judges: Dennis, Garza, Per Curiam, Prado

Filed Date: 2/23/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023