United States v. Thompson , 169 F. App'x 363 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 27, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-10124
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:03-CR-382
    --------------------
    Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Christopher Thompson appeals from his jury-verdict
    conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm,
    possession of a firearm in a school zone, possession with intent
    to distribute a controlled substance, and possession with intent
    to distribute a controlled substance near a school.     He argues on
    appeal that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to
    support the jury’s verdict on all four counts because it did not
    establish that he knowingly possessed the firearm or the crack
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-10124
    -2-
    cocaine.   As Thompson concedes, he did not move for a judgment of
    acquittal at the end of the Government’s case or at the close of
    all evidence.
    When viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s
    verdict, the evidence shows that Thompson knowingly possessed the
    firearm and the crack cocaine found in the vehicle he was driving
    shortly before his arrest.    Accordingly, Thompson’s conviction on
    all four counts does not constitute a manifest miscarriage of
    justice.   See United States v. Griffin, 
    324 F.3d 330
    , 356 (5th
    Cir. 2003).
    The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-10124

Citation Numbers: 169 F. App'x 363

Judges: Garza, Per Curiam, Prado, Smith

Filed Date: 2/27/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023