Christopher Proffit v. Larry Rowley , 44 F. App'x 748 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                        United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-2354
    ___________
    Christopher Proffit,                  *
    *
    Appellant,               *
    *      Appeal from the United States
    v.                              *      District Court for the Eastern
    *      District of Missouri.
    Larry Rowley, Acting Superintendent   *
    of NECC; Douglas Prudden, ASOM;       *               [UNPUBLISHED]
    Stacy Hinch, Correctional Officer II, *
    NECC; Mary Riorden, Assistant         *
    Superintendent, NECC; Unknown         *
    Keffier, Caseworker Assistant Housing *
    Seven, NECC; Unknown Keiffer,         *
    Functional Unit Manager, Housing Unit *
    #1; B. Board, C.O.I. #42350,          *
    *
    Appellees.               *
    ___________
    Submitted: July 19, 2002
    Filed: August 22, 2002
    ___________
    Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Missouri inmate Christopher Proffit appeals the district court’s pre-service
    dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.
    § 1915(e)(2)(B). Mr. Proffit seeks leave to proceed without prepayment of fees, the
    district court having certified that his appeal was not taken in good faith. We grant
    Mr. Proffit leave to appeal in forma pauperis and leave to the district court the details
    of calculating the initial partial appellate filing fee, and the collection of the balance
    of the $105 appellate filing fee. See Henderson v. Norris, 
    129 F.3d 481
    , 484-85 (8th
    Cir. 1997).
    Further, we affirm the dismissal of all of Mr. Proffit’s claims except for his
    allegations that defendants retaliated against him in various specified ways in
    connection with his lawsuit against prison officials. On remand, Mr. Proffit should
    be directed to amend his complaint to identify: (1) each person he is naming as a
    defendant; and (2) what retaliatory act each defendant took against him.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2354

Citation Numbers: 44 F. App'x 748

Filed Date: 8/22/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023