United States v. Smyre ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 94-5622
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ROGER LEWIS SMYRE, a/k/a Red,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
    District Judge. (CR-93-36)
    Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 22, 1996
    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David Wall Minor, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark
    T. Calloway, United States Attorney, H. Thomas Church, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Roger Lewis Smyre pled guilty to distributing crack cocaine.
    He was sentenced to 140 months incarceration, four years of super-
    vised release, and a $50 special assessment. Smyre noted a timely
    appeal. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), stating that in his view there exist no
    meritorious grounds for appeal. Smyre filed a supplemental brief
    claiming that the district court erred by denying his request to
    substitute his counsel due to an alleged conflict of interest and
    he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Smyre's claims
    cannot be reviewed on direct appeal. United States v. DeFusco, 
    949 F.2d 114
    , 120-21 (4th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 
    503 U.S. 997
    (1992).
    We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance
    with the requirements of Anders, 
    supra,
     and find no meritorious
    issue for appeal. Counsel has moved to withdraw from further repre-
    sentation. The court requires that counsel inform his client, in
    writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United
    States for further review. If the client requests that a petition
    be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivo-
    lous, then counsel may move in this court at that time for leave to
    withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a
    copy thereof was served on the client. We therefore deny counsel's
    motion to withdraw at this stage of the proceedings. We further
    deny Smyre's motion to substitute his attorney. We affirm the
    district court's judgment order. We dispense with oral argument
    2
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 94-5622

Filed Date: 4/22/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021