United States v. Guajardo , 79 F. App'x 57 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  October 22, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-10310
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    MIGUEL GUAJARDO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:02-CR-190-1-A
    --------------------
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Miguel Guajardo pleaded guilty to conspiracy, possession
    with intent to distribute more than 5000 grams of cocaine, and
    distribution of more than 500 grams of cocaine.   There was no
    plea agreement, but Guajardo stipulated to a factual resume
    supporting the plea.   Guajardo moved to withdraw his guilty plea,
    asserting that he did not speak English and did not understand
    the guilty plea proceeding.   The district court held a hearing
    and denied the motion.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-10310
    -2-
    Guajardo argues that the district court abused its
    discretion by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.       In
    denying the motion, the district court considered the appropriate
    factors set out in United States v. Carr, 
    740 F.2d 339
    , 343-44
    (5th Cir. 1984).   The district court found, among other things,
    that the plea was knowing and voluntary and that Guajardo had
    perjured himself in testifying that the plea documents and
    proceedings were not translated fully.    If the district court's
    factual findings rest upon credibility determinations after an
    evidentiary hearing, this court will not substitute its reading
    of the evidence for that of the district court.    See United
    States v. Nixon, 
    881 F.2d 1305
    , 1310-12 (5th Cir. 1989).     In
    light of the district court’s credibility determination, Guajardo
    has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in
    denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he made no
    showing of a fair and just reason justifying the withdrawal under
    Carr.   See United States v. Brewster, 
    137 F.3d 853
    , 857-58
    (5th Cir. 1998).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-10310

Citation Numbers: 79 F. App'x 57

Judges: Jolly, King, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/21/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023