United States v. Diaz , 103 F. App'x 851 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  August 4, 2004
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 04-40114
    Summary Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOEL BENAVIDEZ DIAZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC Nos. B-02-CV-131
    B-01-CR-139-1
    --------------------
    Before JOLLY, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Joel Benavidez Diaz, federal prisoner #94714-079, requests a
    certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s
    denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.   This court must examine
    the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary.
    Mosley v. Cozby, 
    813 F.2d 659
    , 660 (5th Cir. 1987).     An
    examination of the record in this case discloses that no final
    judgment has been entered as a separate document as required by
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 04-40114
    -2-
    FED. R. CIV. P. 58.   See Baker v. Mercedes Benz of N. Am., 
    114 F.3d 57
    , 60 (5th Cir. 1997).
    If we were to treat the order of November 14, 2002, as a
    Rule 58 judgment, there was no timely notice of appeal filed by
    Diaz.     Moreover, because, under the peculiar facts of this case,
    it would be unjust to apply the amendments to FED. R. CIV. P. 58,
    effective December 1, 2002, we conclude that the appeal must be
    dismissed pursuant to the procedure set out in Townsend v. Lucas,
    
    745 F.2d 933
    , 934 (5th Cir. 1984).     See Burt v. Ware, 
    14 F.3d 256
    , 258-59 (5th Cir. 1994).     Diaz may rectify the lack of a
    separate document judgment by filing in the district court a
    motion requesting the entry of a Rule 58 judgment.     See 
    id. After a
    Rule 58 judgment is entered, a new notice of appeal must
    be filed within the time prescribed by FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1).
    See 
    id. APPEAL DISMISSED;
    COA DENIED AS MOOT.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-40114

Citation Numbers: 103 F. App'x 851

Judges: Emilio, Garza, Jolly, Per Curiam, Pickering

Filed Date: 8/4/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023