Mitchell (William) v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • An unpub|isl ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TI-IE STATE OF NEVADA
    WILLIAM H. MITCHELL_, No. 661'7 3
    Appellant,
    vs.
    THE STATE OF NEVADA, F § E*" E @
    Respondent. SEp 03 2014
    m 1_ o<. L\N:JEMAN
    cLER F rt coua'r
    av ‘
    DEPUTY CLERK
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
    This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of appellant’s
    "Motion to Transport." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County;
    David B. Barker_, Judge.
    We lack jurisdiction because no statute or court rule provides
    for an appeal from such a decision. Ca,stillo v. State, 
    106 Nev. 349
    , 352,
    
    792 P.2d 1133
    , 1135 (1990). Therefore, we
    ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
    /~:a.»»»€m§@\ ,J.
    Hardesty
    Douglas Cherry d
    ccc Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
    Carl E. G. Arnold
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    Williani H. Mitchell
    SuF'nEME Coun'r
    or
    NEvAoA
    .;»:»:1947,-\   _Zqj_/(p
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 66173

Filed Date: 9/9/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021