United States v. Edward Ouma ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6915 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD OUMA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-252) Submitted: September 8, 1999 Decided: September 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Ouma, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edward Ouma appeals the district court’s order denying Ouma’s motions to reconsider, for writ of coram nobis, and for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ouma, No. CR-98-252 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2